A sneak peak into Behavioural Biases that if not made consciously aware of will unconsciously trick traders into making imprudent trading decisions that can lead to losses.
Professor Richard Thaler is one of the leading figures in the Behavioral Finance academic world and has been credited with the term “Mental Accounting”. Here is one of my favourite examples used to describe the bias.
The Man in the Green Bathrobe
A couple go to Las Vegas on honeymoon and after an enjoyable evening of dinner, theater and some bedroom activity Joe decides to soak in the night air by smoking a cigar on the balcony of their suite. After what seemed like a short break Joe discovers that Sophie is fast asleep. On his way over to kiss his gorgeous wife good night Joe puts his hands in the pocket of his green hotel bathrobe and discovers a casino chip in his pocket. It has the number 17 on it and an inner voice starts speaking to him, “Joe, this is the one.” Without wasting any time, Joe is off to the casino with his lucky number 17 chip.
He puts the $5 chip on 17 and up comes 17. Next spin he puts his winnings on 17 and again it comes up. Joe repeats this routine a number of times until he reaches the maximum bet the casino will take; he now has $268 million riding on 17 and after what seems like an eternity the ball lands on 18. Joe has lost it all. With the little bit of energy left in him, he walks to his room and flops on the bed. His beautiful young wife Sophie wakes up from her sleep and asks Joe where he has been. He responds that he was gambling, so she asked how he did, and he said “not too good; I lost $5.” This example illustrates how we compartmentalize our finance. Joe put the $5 and then the subsequent $268 million in a separate compartment from his wealth. To him it was never really his. The very same kind of mental accounting happens when we receive a refund from the taxman that was somewhat unexpected. Instead of absorbing the new money into our existing pot, we somehow see this new money as a windfall and worthy of extravagant spending, which is different from how we would treat our own money. I hope you can start to see how this error in judgement could have disastrous effects when approaching trading. I am sure none of you have treated the profits made on a trade as winnings to have a full go with.
]]>[vsw id=”MumhP1TBC6A” source=”youtube” width=”425″ height=”344″ autoplay=”no”]
]]>
Obviously I had heard about mindfulness but never in the context of trading. When Steve introduced me to the concept and the benefits in trading pretty much at the beginning of our coaching journey, I wasn’t too crazy about it.. okay, I have to admit – I hated it!!! I really struggled with the concept, it made me aggressive as my mind was like an unruly child going here and there just not finding the stillness. Poor Steve, I think I complained a lot about it (very unenlightened .. oops). But you see he has developed this step by step approach to tame unruly trader minds gently getting into the habit and how to make the most of the experience.
After only 3 months of really getting over myself and sticking with it no matter what and most importantly just trusting in the process (and my coach), I have become pretty good at it and I must say I today I totally love mindfulness ..don’t want to live without it anymore.. seriously.. it has made a massive impact not only on my trading performance and experience but also overall on my whole life.
Well, I hope you enjoy this little youtube clip
That’s why so many of us teach meditation. Because when you stop thought, you stop resistant thought. When you stop resistant thought, then you let it in. That’s why we teach appreciation, because when you’re in appreciation, you are not in the mode of resistance, and you are letting it in.
— Abraham
Excerpted from the workshop in North Los Angeles, CA on Monday, August 13th, 2001 # 566
Also, check out Steve’s latest article on mindfulness:
Mandi
]]>This clip about subliminal advertising and how he is able to manipulate those guy’s thinking patterns makes me wonder in how far traders are at the effect of subliminal messages which subconsciously impact trading decisions?
]]>
Regret aversion also makes people unduly apprehensive about taking positions after a string of losses, as they feel instinctively driven to conserve, to retreat, and to lick their wounds. This might cause them to hesitate most at moments that actually merit aggressive behaviour.
This can also affect a person’s response to winning positions. For example, traders might be unwillingly to sell an in-the-money position despite negative signals, choosing to cling on to it because they fear that the stock might continue to soar even higher once they sell it.
People who are regret-averse try to avoid distress arising from two types of mistakes, (i) errors of commission and (ii) errors of omission. The former occurs when we take misguided actions, while the latter arises from misguided inaction, that is, opportunities overlooked or foregone.
The other danger comes from “herding behaviour” where traders simply try to follow the crowd, since following the mass consensus diffuses responsibility and hence the potential for future regret.
The way out of this is to have confidence in your methods and your skill, so that despite a string of losses, you will still be able to trade consistently, because you know that in the long run, you will be able to recoup those losses and turn up a profit when you manage to catch the big moves. The key here is discipline and consistency.”
“I visualized my grief if the stock market went way up and I wasn’t in it – or if it went way down and I was completely in it. My intention was to minimize my future regret, so I split my retirement plan contributions 50/50 between bonds and equities.” – Harry Markowitz, father of Modern Portfolio Theory
]]>
Afterwards I had a little chat with him and it turned out that he had no clue what I was on about when I spoke about my strategy with technical analysis.
But… the one thing we both agreed on was not just the importance, but also the fascination of trading psychology. It turned out that we are into the same books and very much had the same approach to it in the context of his investing and my trading, interesting huh?
Hey, I’d encourage you to join his 15 day free educational newsletter. I really thought it was good value.
May today bring you lots of intelligent enlightenment 
Mandi
]]>1. Johnny’s mother had three children. The first child was named April. The second child was named May. What was the third child’s name?
2. A clerk at a butcher shop stands five feet ten inches tall and wears size 13 sneakers. What does he weigh?
3. Before Mt. Everest was discovered, what was the highest mountain in the world?
4. How much dirt is there in a hole that measures two feet by three feet by four feet?
5. What word in the English language is always spelled incorrectly?
6. Billie was born on December 28th, yet her birthday always falls in the summer. How is this possible?
7. In British Columbia you cannot take a picture of a man with a wooden leg. Why not?
8. If you were running a race and you passed the person in 2nd place, what place would you be in now?
9. Which is correct to say, “The yolk of the egg is white” or “The yolk of the egg are white?”
10. A farmer has five haystacks in one field and four haystacks in another. How many haystacks would he have if he combined them all in one field?
How did you go? You can find the answers here http://www.forbes.com/sites/work-in-progress/2012/05/15/10-brainteasers-to-test-your-mental-sharpness
This little test is a great example of how our natural decision making is massively influenced by the brains habitual filtering processes of distortion, generalisation, filtering for sameness or differences etc. If you are not aware of how the mechanics of your brain operate, you will be at the mercy of it. However, if you learn to understand the workings of your brain just like you would study the mechanics of high performance athletes in your chosen sport, you will be able to deliberately influence and use your brain to create profits.
]]>Here is an excerpt: “In a 2003 study, Kevin Dunbar, a psychologist at the University of Maryland, showed undergraduates a few short videos of two different-sized balls falling. The first clip showed the two balls falling at the same rate. The second clip showed the larger ball falling at a faster rate. The footage was a reconstruction of the famous (and probably apocryphal) experiment performed by Galileo, in which he dropped cannonballs of different sizes from the Tower of Pisa. Galileo’s metal balls all landed at the exact same time—a refutation of Aristotle, who claimed that heavier objects fell faster.
While the students were watching the footage, Dunbar asked them to select the more accurate representation of gravity. Not surprisingly, undergraduates without a physics background disagreed with Galileo. They found the two balls falling at the same rate to be deeply unrealistic. (Intuitively, we’re all Aristotelians.) Furthermore, when Dunbar monitored the subjects in an fMRI machine, he found that showing non-physics majors the correct video triggered a particular pattern of brain activation: there was a squirt of blood to the anterior cingulate cortex, a collar of tissue located in the center of the brain. The A.C.C. is typically associated with the perception of errors and contradictions—neuroscientists often refer to it as part of the “Oh shit!” circuit—so it makes sense that it would be turned on when we watch a video of something that seems wrong, even if it’s right.
So that I don’t get in trouble please continue reading the article here: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/frontal-cortex/2012/06/brain-experiments-why-we-dont-believe-science.html#ixzz1z5kOiuCU
Now, the question beckons, what does it mean for the quality of your trading analysis and decisions?
]]>a) the hope that things will turn around and .
b) we get emotionally attached or ‘anchored’ to a certain price that we hope to ‘get’ back to again or at least to get out break even.
c) we justifying holding on to the trade with the old adage: “A loss is only a loss when the trade is closed” or we find new reasons why we could give the trade just one last chance to turn around
What do all of these ‘reasons’ have in common? It’s simple. The “YOU” Factor! They have nothing to do with fundamentals or technicals, and everything to do with your psychology. The culprit really are those innate, subconscious behaviors also called biases in the neuro science world that evolution has equipped us with so that we stand a better chance of surviving. I always wonder if the people who invented the stock market actually studied those biases (according to www.businessdictionary.com a bias is ‘An inclination or preference that influences judgement from being balanced or even-handed’) and then created the rules of the game in such a way that we are prone to fail. Those subconscious survival instincts for sure helped to survive when we were Cave Men, but in the world of trading these behaviors are capable of sabotaging us unless we are consciously aware of them and their impact upon our behavior.
There are plenty of decision-making and behavioural biases that even experienced traders fall victim to. So it is really important to be aware of when making trading decisions.
]]>
Remember the brain takes processing shortcuts by selecting an initial reference point and then basing it’s decisions around that point.
Try it out yourself: what feels better to you, if I say, ‘this strategy has a 30% probability to lose money’ or ‘this strategy has a 70% probability to make money’. It is still the same risk reward in both scenarios, right? It shows that we evaluate outcomes in terms of profit and losses from the initial point they started the evaluation from.
So, the starting point in the superstore was $1500 and I was then offered a saving for paying cash. This felt for me like I had been offered a saving which is an improvement from the reference point. However, with the local computer shop the reference point was $1450 with a potential price increase for paying with CC which left me feeling like a change for the worse compared to my reference point.
The instinctive behavior that causes this way of evaluating is that we experience a certain loss as far more unpleasant than we appreciate a profit of exactly the same amount or as Steve puts it: ‘the pain of losing money is greater than the pleasure of making money’ and that’s why it is closely related to the much dreaded problem of loss aversion, where traders lose the most amount of money by trying to avoid a loss and on the other hand take their losses far more quickly.
Isn’t this bizarre when you consider that it’s all the same but instinctively we go with the one that we perceive to be a gain even if factually it is not?
]]>